December 15, 2010

Don't Forget the Family Pet in your Trust


What happens to your animal after you die? We worry about our children and our grandchildren when planning for our future, but our family pets deserve to be remembered as well. Few people would argue that their pet is a part of their family, which is why it is so important to include them in our planning.

In a recent article in USA TODAY, "Pet Talk: For pets' sake, include them in your estate planning,"  Sharon L. Peters discusses why taking the legal steps to ensure your pet's well being is so vital. Many pets end up in shelters after their owners die, and sadly these shelters can only keep animals for so long before they are euthanized. There are many ways your estate planning lawyer can help you ensure your pet avoids this fate, but mentioning your pet in your will may not be enough.

The Law Offices of Daniel O. Hands, P.C. offers services for pet owners. Ask your lawyer how you can ensure your pet is cared for after you can no longer care for it.

To view the article by Sharon L. Peters, posted Dec 8, 2010 on USA TODAY, go to: 
http://www.usatoday.com/

November 1, 2010

Estate Planning Seminar in November!


We will be holding a FREE estate planning seminar this month.

Saturday, November 20, 2010

10 am- 12:00 noon

The Law Offices of Daniel O. Hands P.C.
Oak Brook, IL


Topics covered will include:
  • Avoiding probate court
  • Planning for long term nursing care
  • Protecting your estate from the IRS
  • Planning for your special needs relatives
How can I register?


We hope to see you soon.

September 15, 2010

Why Won’t Michael Jackson’s Children Inherit His Money Until They Are Forty?

When the King of Pop died, he left behind him not only a musical legacy but also a legacy of debt. Poor financial decisions left him debt ridden near the end of his life. Nevertheless, Michael Jackson didn’t die a pauper. As with many celebrities, even after his death his estate continues increasing in value. Continued record sales will bolster his estate, leaving a considerable amount of money to his heirs after his debts are paid. His young children could become billionaires before their eighteenth birthdays, but they won’t.

Many parents hope their children won’t make the same mistakes that they made in their youth, and Jackson must have hoped his children would not be as reckless with their money as he was. In his trust he set out to ensure his children would learn from his financial mistakes. How does Jackson’s trust ensure his children won’t squander their money and end up as debt ridden as their father?

In his will, Michael Jackson left the entirety of his estate to the Michael Jackson Family Trust, and it’s within the trust that the actual breakdown of his estate occurs. He has designated a committee of trustees, including his mother Katherine, to handle the distribution of his assets. (Katherine is guardian of his children, and she is to inherit forty percent of his estate.) A closer look at the trust will reveal why Jackson’s children won’t be spending their entire inheritance any time soon.

Jackson’s trust lays out a very specific timeline for the distribution of money to his children. The Michael Jackson Family Trust specifically stipulates that his children will not receive their full inheritance until the age of forty. Until that time the children will receive an allowance, which is determined by the trustees. Upon turning twenty-one each child can appeal to the trustees for money. When they turn thirty, the children will receive one third of the remaining share. At thirty-five, they will get half their remaining share. It is not until they are forty that Jackson’s children will receive their full inheritance.

What if one of his children requires extra funds before they are forty? The trust stipulates that a child’s distribution may be accelerated in the following situations: if the child wishes to start a family, buy a home, or engage in a business venture. Nevertheless, the trustees are under obligation to ensure any business venture or investment is sound. Jackson’s trust allows for some flexibility, but even the parameters of flexibility are designed to ensure his children won’t carelessly spend their money.

In addition to financial responsibility, perhaps Jackson also wished to teach his children a little bit about generosity. Though he left his estate to be divided amongst his three children and mother, Jackson also left twenty percent of his estate to be distributed amongst children’s charities.

Is this breakdown the best way to ensure Jackson’s children will learn financial responsibility before inheriting billions? It is hard for us to determine whether this is the best breakdown or not, for each family’s situation is unique. It is up to each family to decide what is best for their children after they’re gone. Jackson sought to ensure his children won’t receive their full inheritance until they have matured into adults, and have hopefully learned how to handle their finances. For his family, this may indeed be the best breakdown.

A qualified estate planning attorney can help you find the best way to distribute your assets after you’re gone.  Helping families determine the best estate plan for their needs is what we do at the Law Offices of Daniel O. Hands, P.C. For some families, an inheritance distributed over the course of time is the best choice.

September 7, 2010

Upcoming Seminar!


We will be holding a FREE estate planning seminar this month.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

10 am- 12:00 noon

The Law Offices of Daniel O. Hands P.C.
Oak Brook, IL

Topics covered will include:
  • Avoiding probate court
  • Planning for long term nursing care
  • Protecting your estate from the IRS
  • Planning for your special needs relatives
How can I register?


We hope to see you soon.

September 1, 2010

How Do I Divide My Assets Fairly When My Assets Can’t be Evenly Split?

Or What Does William Shakespeare Have to Do With My Trust?


Though we may wish otherwise, sometimes sibling rivalries can last long into adulthood. As a parent, you may want to leave your children equal shares in your estate. But what if your estate can’t be evenly split? How do you fairly divide your assets amongst the children to avoid increasing tension between the siblings?

We can learn a lot about what not to do from William Shakespeare’s play “King Lear.” In Shakespeare’s play, the King decides he is ready to retire and offers the largest share of his realm to the daughter who loves him best. Sparing you the gruesome details the play can be summed up as follows: Lear goes insane, bitter sibling rivalries become deadly, war erupts, and betrayals abound. Had Lear consulted with an estate planning attorney, he may have been able to avoid the messy end; instead of tearing his family apart he may have been able to leave his daughters with a peaceful, comfortable existence.

So what should you do if your assets can’t be evenly divided amongst your children? Imagine that you, like Lear, have three daughters: Gina, Rebecca, and Christine.

You also have a piece of land that has been in the family since your grandparents were first married. Neither you nor your daughters want the land to be sold outside of the family. The land is worth $1.5 million and your total estate is worth $3 million. You consider the options:
  • You would like to divide the land into three equal parts and leave one part to each of your daughters. There are a few complications, however. Firstly, there is a huge grove of crab apple trees on the west end of the property, making it difficult to build on this part of the land. Whichever daughter received that third would have the difficult task of bulldozing the grove. Moreover, a manmade swimming pond in the northeast corner is highly desirable, but impossibly placed to be shared amongst all daughters. Most importantly, Christine works at a hospital in the city and she is not interested in inheriting the property.
  •  
  • You could give each daughter an undivided 1/3 of the property. However you are skeptical of this option. Gina and Rebecca have never been able to agree on anything, and especially with Christine in the city you can’t see the three girls agreeing on plans for the property. You’re worried that after your death rather than a peaceful inheritance your daughters would end up with sibling warfare only slightly less brutal than Lear’s daughters.
  • What if you don’t divide the land at all? Gina and her husband are still renting property while Rebecca already owns property with her husband. You could give the land to Gina. Nevertheless this still isn’t a fair division. Gina will inherit $1.5 million of property, leaving Rebecca and Christine with $750,000 each. Though they may not want the land, they may still feel jilted by the uneven division.
  • You’re starting to wonder if there’s a fair way to divide your assets at all. Perhaps like Lear you will have to leave your daughters to fight over the estate.

There is a solution, and it’s one a qualified estate planning attorney could help you arrange. A $1.5 million life insurance policy would increase the estate to $4.5 million, leaving Gina with a $1.5 million property but also leaving Rebecca and Christine with $1.5 million of assets. Each child would inherit a fair share in your legacy, and you would finally be able to relax knowing that you’ve helped spare your children a potentially ugly rivalry.

Life insurance can be fairly inexpensive, especially if you get a “second-to-die” policy which pays off after you and your spouse are gone. If you own that insurance in a properly designed Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, it would not be estate taxable. (For more information on an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, go to our website http://www.handslaw.com/daURL/EP/estate-planning-news.aspx.)

Helping families avoid a fate like Lear’s is something I have been doing for over 30 years. If you think this solution would be best for your family, or if you want more information on dividing your assets, you should contact your estate planning attorney to help you find the best solution for your family.

August 15, 2010

My Grandma Already has an Estate Plan, Why Does She Keep Worrying?

Recently, your grandma hasn’t been herself. She was always a quiet and calm woman, but now she seems very unsettled. Whenever you visit she spends her time pulling dirty boxes out of the basement and distributing old clothes, toys, notebooks, and tools to you and your other family members. She has been talking a lot about “when I go.”

You know this change has been prompted in part by you grandpa’s death. Grandpa died two years ago, and in the last year Grandma has become obsessed with old pictures and stories. Her living room is full of cluttered memorabilia she has unearthed from the basement. While you’re interested in learning your family history, you’re concerned because it’s all Grandma wants to talk about.
She has also been worrying a lot recently. She worries about Uncle Bob and who will take care of him. She worries about Uncle Carl and his finances, and she worries that your mom will be left with the burden of caring for all these things after Grandma passes away.

You try to insist your grandma not worry so much, but one afternoon as she is napping you and your spouse see that she has brought up a big red binder marked “Estate Planning Portfolio.” You have been talking about setting up an estate plan yourselves so you look through the binder, perusing Grandma’s trust. These documents were signed three years ago, when Grandpa was first sick, and as you read them you become increasingly concerned. Perhaps Grandma is right to worry so much.

Legally speaking, things went smoothly after Grandpa’s death. However, things were much simpler after Grandpa died; all the assets were transferred to Grandma. You start thinking about what will happen when Grandma dies. The house, her finances, the car, the dog….all of these things will have to be divided equally among your mom and her two brothers.

This worries you. When Grandma and Grandpa first signed their trust your uncles were both thriving financially and physically. Since then, Uncle Bob has had a heart attack and now he needs medical care which he cannot afford without government assistance. If Uncle Bob inherited the assets as currently drafted, he would lose his Medicaid and his inheritance would all go to pay for his care.

Uncle Carl’s wife lost her job a year ago, and his family has been struggling to make ends meet on Carl’s salary. It would be terrible if his inheritance were lost to their creditors.

Grandma was also right about your mom. As the older sister, you know your mom would take responsibility for her brothers and use her inheritance to help Bob and Carl stay afloat.

You decide to talk with Grandma about her estate plan. You make a list of things to discuss with Grandma:

1. A Special Needs Trust for Uncle Bob
2. Asset Protection for Uncle Carl
3. Update who is to manage the assets if she becomes incapacitated or upon her death
4. Update who is to manage her healthcare if she becomes incapacitated
5. My Legacy Workbook (to preserve the stories and photos she keeps finding in the basement)

You know once Grandma has been in for a review with her estate planning attorney she will be able to stop worrying so much about her children, and will be able to enjoy her old age better. Also, once she has a workbook to keep old stories and photos maybe she’ll let you get a word in edgewise at the dinner table!

Not every family is like yours, and so every family’s conversation with their estate planning attorney will be different. But it is easy to call your estate planning attorney and set up a free trust review appointment. Once it’s done, everyone will feel much better.

Compliments of the Law Offices of Daniel O. Hands, P.C.

July 15, 2010

I'm not planning on going anywhere! Why is everyone saying 2010 is a good year to die?

Why 2010 May Be a Good Year to Die:

The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 provides that in 2010 the estate tax is repealed and there is no estate tax. Therefore, from a tax perspective, 2010 may be a very good year to die. But, we don't know for sure, as many experts expect Congress to act to prevent the repeal of the estate tax. This article written by Steve Hartnett, Associate Director of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys spells out the process for getting a new estate tax measure passed in Congress and the impact of the delays.*

To read more about the current status of the estate tax follow this link to our website: 

http://www.handslaw.com/daURL/v5/global_cda.aspx?cid=9729&ctid=3177

Check back here at our blog for the latest updates!

*Article compliments of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, By: Stephen C. Hartnett, J.D., LL.M. (Tax)

July 1, 2010

What is estate planning?

In its most basic form, estate planning is the process of planning for the management and disposition of your assets and resources when you are deceased or no longer able to manage your own affairs. While most people think estate planning is just worrying about assets or minimizing income and estate taxes, it is really much more. Estate planning is really about accomplishing your goals during your life and beyond.

Although many people share similar goals, the process of estate planning involves identifying your own specific goals. Once you identify them you can, along with your advisors, determine the best strategies to achieve them. Since people are different, this estate planning process will be very different from person to person.

*Excerpt from Love, Money, Control: Reinventing Estate Planning by Daniel O. Hands, Robert A. Esperti, and Renno L. Peterson

June 15, 2010

What’s in an estate?

Your estate is, simply, everything that you own. An estate consists of your investments such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, annuities, bank accounts, and certificates of deposit; your retirement accounts such as individual retirement accounts and 401(k) plans; real estate; and life insurance policies. It also consists of your “stuff”- furniture, appliances, jewelry, collectibles, and all the other items of personal property. The value of your estate is the value of all these assets, less mortgages and any other debt.

*Excerpt from Love, Money, Control: Reinventing Estate Planning by Daniel O. Hands, Robert A. Esperti, and Renno L. Peterson

June 1, 2010

Isn’t estate planning just for rich people?

It’s not about how much wealth you have accumulated that’s important; it’s about what and who are important to you. Take as an example a widow with two grown children who has only a house and $200,000 from a life insurance policy on her late husband. Does she need estate planning to protect herself and her two children? To some people, $200,000 isn’t a lot of money. Even so, the widow wants to be assured that she can live in comfort in her own home. What if her son has an alcohol problem? Wouldn’t she worry that he will just drink up whatever amount she leaves him at her death? Wouldn’t she feel better leaving money to him in such a way that it could be used for his rehabilitation? It’s not whether you have an estate that requires planning, it’s whether planning will provide you with a sense of comfort and well-being about your and your family’s future.

*Excerpt from Love, Money, Control: Reinventing Estate Planning by Daniel O. Hands, Robert A. Esperti, and Renno L. Peterson